2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 411.50

+0.6%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (62896)	5/10/2010 9:18:16 PM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) of 219132

just in in-tray player 1: This is what SEC and JD really need to investigate. The probability of a 'risk-taking' prop operation being profitable on 100% of trading days in a qtr is distinctly less than winning the Irish sweepstakes. Guess they needed to improve on their recent qtr of 'only' 97%. Front-running the Fed and Tsy? Let's find out. Violating securities laws by illegal short-sale arbitrages? You bet, they already admitted that one. Dark pool computer just a fancy innovation to front-run? You bet, that's why GS had the prosecutor claim the technology would enable 'widespread market manipulation' if in the 'wrong hands'. Right. I swear if I was a GS client I'd terminate the relationship to prevent them from front-running my orders and trading off knowledge of my account. Oops, I already did that. Right. player 2: My HF is held at Goldman, but I have and will always trade away, on certain positions for the exact reasons you state. Particularly less liquid names.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next