SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (566247)5/14/2010 5:47:17 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) of 1576965
 
Wrong.

"....instead you accused CJ of being wrong and lying. This is becoming a pattern......."

I didn't accuse him of being wrong about the topic. CJ, however, did lie about me. My comment was directly referenced to the article Al posted. I said, according to the article (Al posted) both men denied having sex. In the article (Al posted) that was accurate and there was no further information until later. I was not lying about that, making CJs allegation a lie.

So when CJ called me a liar, he was lying. He conveniently ignored the sequence and deliberately twisted the context. I commented on the internal content of the article and only that. He accused me of lying about the broader news on the topic, which is not true, I hadn't even seen it. I told the truth, CJ lied about it (or maneuvered, as you like to put it). The fact that the hooker later contradicted himself does not make me a liar.

Are you really that dumb?

"It makes you look like the REAL dirtbag."

No it doesn't, it is an attempt to do that, but we are all familiar with CJ's 'maneuvering' now. No one believes him. You and your disgusting little tribe of codependants can chortle about how it looks that way but even you know better, so no 'appearance' was genuinely created... other than the appearance of your silly little clown puppets dancing about making noises, which is not cute. It's your life, do as you wish I don't care but I don't have to watch grown men acting like miscreant imbeciles if I don't want to, which is why I put CJ on ignor.

When more than once when I've called him on it, 20+ posters rec'd it. Of course I know, that doesn't mean 20+ posters actually agreed with me, it means 20+ posters felt other people should take a look because they'd likely agree with me too. Multiples of 20 then... probably not, but it is certainly obvious that no one is being fooled by CJ's 'maneuvering.' Most people think it is childish and stupid enough to recommend that point of view. A few of your associates probably like to tell themselves and you that's what is happening (creating a look), but it is not. Them's the fax Jax. And that is why you guys were so quick to discount the recommendations and confirmations.

Maybe you are really that dumb.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext