SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Sandstorm Gold
SAND 12.12-6.0%Oct 17 5:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Claude Cormier who wrote (27)5/18/2010 9:16:51 AM
From: Metacomet  Read Replies (1) of 1133
 
You think they are cheap?

I dunno..

I guess the entire concept of warrants must be a bit of a mystery to me.

But then the behaviour of mining shares in general are a bit of an enigma.

I tend to think of warrants as interchangeable with options.

Seems to me that in the money warrants, given some reasonable time constraint, should run, at least, penny for penny with the underlying, and with a time lever, do even better.

And I have done enough of the Kool-Aid to think that gold will perform well in the coming years.

Since these warrants are a proxy on the value of gold as well as the success of SSL, is your feeling that Sandstorm may not perform well enough in the next 4 years to warrant the warrants?

Or are you simply suggesting that such an outcome is not only possible but baked into the price?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News