SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Triffin who wrote (4914)5/26/2010 11:13:17 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) of 24213
 
wakey wakey
:>)
Damn, Triff,have we been getting trolls there, or what?
I'll be glad when this is over, and they can all get back to burning oil again.
==

Triffin on May 26, 2010 - 9:31am
I really, really, hope that the Top Kill works ..

But, if it doesn't, and the primary leak/spill is
at the BOP, then I'd think the next effort would be to
capture the flow as best as possible while the RWs are
being drilled ..

The idea that I've been noodling around is as follows:

Lower a large diameter concrete or steel tube with open
ends of sufficient diameter to encircle the entire BOP ..
I'm thinking something 16-20' diameter and 40-60' long or
long enough that once it has settled into the seabed that the
top of the "tube" is higher than the BOP .. A sort of chimney
if you will .. Then lower something like the "top hat" device
or inverted funnel with a riser of sufficient diameter to avoid
hydrate formation; onto the top of the previously placed large
diameter tube .. I'm not sure that the two pieces would have
to even make a complete seal with one another .. The idea
is to capture the bulk of the flow from the BOP until the
RWs can be completed ..

ROCKMAN .. Is this at all feasible ??

Triff ..
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext