SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Analysis Class for Beginners

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Arthur Tang who wrote (642)11/6/1997 3:32:00 PM
From: raymond marcotte  Read Replies (1) of 1471
 
i have heard that $ makes the world go around, but there more poor people than rich people, and the rich people have so much more than they need that all they really have that the poor don't have is guaranteed subsistance and bragging rights.

speculative bubbles, large and small, are not explained by either of your 'two ways to analyze wall street.' so, i must conclude that you really meant 'among the many ways, here are ...'

the paper value of all stocks in any market is the marginal (last) price of each trade times each of the corresponding outstanding units. now that is really incredible! everything is valued at the margin. this is good if the market is perfectly efficient. on average, it must be assumed to be otherwise arbitragers would instantly have work to do everywhere in the market. but we know that many of these sidline speculators are constantly being bankrupted. they perform a very valuable constraint on most fluctuations.

to the extent more and more people believe that these marginal trades are a measure of their net worth, they either feel wealthier or poorer. even when they have no need for more or less liquidity they may be seduced into action and join the marginal traders. nominal practices and resources in marketplaces do not accomodate such imbalances well. thus, not money, but perceptions will determine weather markets become more or less risky. when the risk-and-price are outside nominal or historical ranges a correction up or down becomes overdue. just when, is not predictable. luck more likely issues the instruction to change course. there may be some forewarning but never so systematically correct to concentrate too much in the hands of too few lucky ones that are not sleeping at the time -- on average the would is sleeping one third of the time.

remembering that only the marginal trade is determining the 'value' of an asset in one instant (history), it is easy to see why the total supply of money has nothing really to do with total value of an asset now or its future value.

there are several empirical underlying facts to support these views. but i will defer to a later time if there is interest in a discussion.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext