Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: combjelly who wrote (569135)	5/31/2010 6:50:05 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) of 1578901

>> Offering of an advisory position. While it isn't clear whether anything illegal occurred or not, a couple of things we DO know are: a) The fact that it was an "unpaid advisory period" is absolutely immaterial -- the use of the phrase was designed to mislead those who don't get it. The position was offered as a quid pro quo, and implicit in that offer is the FACT that the position had value. That's what is required. b) You cannot take the word of the president's lawyer. This would be like asking Johnny Cochran whether "OJ did it" or not. An independent investigation of some kind is necessary to get to the bottom of whether our president is a crook.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next