SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (112270)6/12/2010 5:12:14 PM
From: SliderOnTheBlack16 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 116555
 
Hawk re: "The Evil Saudis"

You mean these guys?





The same Saudis you say are funding the Islamic
fundamentalists who want to kill Jews and US troops,
are embraced by both our current and former President.

Why do you suppose that is?

The same Saudis you say are funding the Islamic
fundamentalists who want to kill Jews and US troops,
are now reportedly going to let the Israelis fly over
Saudi Arabian air space to take out the Iranian nuclear
facilities.

Why do you suppose that is?

"Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites"

timesonline.co.uk

June 12, 2010
By Hugh Tomlinson

"Saudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air
defences to enable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid
on Iran’s nuclear facilities, The Times can reveal.

In the week that the UN Security Council imposed a new round
of sanctions on Tehran, defence sources in the Gulf say that
Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor
of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the
distance for a bombing run on Iran.

To ensure the Israeli bombers pass unmolested, Riyadh has
carried out tests to make certain its own jets are not
scrambled and missile defence systems not activated. Once the
Israelis are through, the kingdom’s air defences will return
to full alert.

“The Saudis have given their permission for the Israelis to
pass over and they will look the other way,” said a US defence
source in the area. “They have already done tests to make sure
their own jets aren’t scrambled and no one gets shot down.
This has all been done with the agreement of the [US] State
Department.”

===============
===============

Hawk, I want you to do me two favors. First, put down your
tube of KY Jelly and last month's issue of Homeland Security
magazine. Now take the thumb of your left hand and place it
firmly under your chin. Now push your thumb straight up,
that's it, keep pushing until your lower jaw meets the upper.

Now hold it right there and take a couple of deep slow breaths
through your nose.

Feels good doesn't it.

Now keep breathing through your nose.

Things getting clearer?

Great, let's continue...

Hawk, It's called "The Hegelian Dialectic."

You're missing the forest for the trees. You're stuck in
tunnel-vision mode from the battlefield, you're focusing
on the puppets, instead of the puppeteers. The Saudis
are puppets, not puppeteers.

The puppeteers control both sides of the conflict.

Thesis—Antithesis—Synthesis

It's all about managed conflict:

Left vs. Right
Democrats vs. Republicans
Liberals vs. Conservatives
East vs. West
Communism vs. Capitalism
Catholics vs. Protestants
Jews vs. Arabs

Professor Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown),
was given total access to all records at the CFR as their official
historian. His book "Tragedy and Hope," was intended to be a
primer for future members of the Council on Foreign Relations,
and those who would be recruited to work for the NGO's, Think
Tanks, and Charitable Foundations of the elite.

And Quigley perfectly explained how the ruling elite use the
conflict of the Hegelian Dialectic when talking about the
illusion of America's two party system, in which both parties
are financed and controlled by the same group.

Quoting Quigley on America's Hegelian political conflict:

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed
ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other
of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire
and academic thinkers.

Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that
the American people can throw the rascals out at any election
without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if
necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these
things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately
the same basic policies."

=================
=================

And it's no different with international geopolitics, they
control (and profit from), both sides of virtually every
global conflict.

Henry Kissinger said military men are "dumb, stupid animals"
to be "used as pawns" for foreign policy (Bob Woodward and
Carl Bernstein, in The Final Days, Ch. 14). And of course
Zbigniew Brzezinski, the puppet-master of the Mujahideen
and the father of Al Qaeda, wrote about his "Grand Chessboard."

Hawk, when you thump your chest like an ape and spew the
talking points given to those at the bottom of the command
and control pyramid, you only further the agenda of the
puppeteers at the top, like Kissinger and Brzezinski.

Let's talk a little bit more about who "they" are, the puppeteers...

Anthony Sutton worked for the Stanford Institute and wrote
a fascinating trilogy exposing the involvement of the bankers,
the multi-national corporatists and the globalists, and their
war profiteering agenda and methods concerning three significant
twentieth-century, historical events:

“Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution”

scribd.com

“Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler”

scribd.com

“Wall Street And FDR”

scribd.com

And Carroll Quigley, in addition to explaining how they manage
and use conflict, also clearly spelled out exactly what their
agenda is, in his two books:

Tragedy and Hope

scribd.com

The Anglo-American Establishment

scribd.com

re: Their agenda...

From Tragedy & Hope, quoting Quigley:

"The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching aim,
nothing less than to create a world system of financial
control in private hands able to dominate the political system
of each country, and the economy of the world as a whole.

This system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by
the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret
agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences.

The apex of the systems was to be the (BIS) Bank for International
Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and
controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves
private corporations. Each central bank…sought to dominate its
government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to
manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of
economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative
politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."

===============
===============

And today you see the CEOs of the world's most powerful
multi-nationals, the central bankers, and the top politicians
from all over the world meeting in secret, under tremendous
security, closed to the media, at Bilderberg, the Trilateral
Commission, at Chatham House (RIIA), the G-8 and G-20 meetings.

Presidents John F. Kennedy and Dwight D. Eisenhower both
warned us about them, and their agenda. Yet the intellectually
impotent and the emotionally crippled find it much easier to
dismiss that which they don't understand to conspiracy theory...

Were Quigley, Sutton, JFK, and Eisenhower all conspiracy theorists?

Or are 98% of Americans just face stuffing, ass sitting,
Survivor watching, sports channel junkies who haven't a clue,
and who don't want to have a clue... who want to dismiss
as "conspiracy theory," all that they do not know, or understand,
and who as Aldous Huxley predicted, would one day not only
love and embrace their slavery, but actually fight to maintain it.

JFK warned us about the Round Table groups and their "secret
societies" and their "secret meetings" in this historic speech:

youtube.com



"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society;
and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to
secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We
decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted
concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers
which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little
value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating
its arbitrary restrictions.

Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of
our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there
is very grave danger that an announced need for increased
security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its
meaning to the very limits of official censorship and
concealment.

That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my
control. And no official of my Administration, whether his
rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my
words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle
dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the
press and the public the facts they deserve to know."

-- President John F. Kennedy

================
================

And President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us about the
unbridled power of the military-industrial complex in his
now famous farewell address on January 17th, 1961:

youtube.com



Eisenhower also spoke to the necessity of "the alert and
knowledgeable citizen," saying...

"Only an alert and knowledgeable citizen can compel the proper
meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense
with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty
may prosper together."

=================
=================

Eisenhower and JFK both warned us, but we didn't listen
to either one, and now we've become a nation of sheep,
governed by pigs, and ruled by wolves.

And we put our professional soldiers into impossible situations.
General Colin Powell may be the best recent example of that...

He now acknowledges he was "used," and he regrets fighting
a war (Iraq), that he now admits America should never have
engaged in.

Admiral William Fallon resigned over his opposition to the
Neo-Cons desire to attack Iran.

So did Director of National Intelligence, Dennis Blair.

General David Petraeus is speaking out against attacking Iran.

And so are former CIA and NSA analysts and officers like
Ray McGovern, Phill Giraldi, and Wayne Madsen.

Throughout military history our Generals and Admirals have
generally fought the wars they were handed. Are we to judge
Colin Powell harshly and hold Admiral Fallon to high esteem?

Is it the duty of our military leadership to refuse to fight
unjust wars? Should a leader resign like Fallon, or fight
an unjust war like Powell?

Those are a tough questions.

Especially in a world where our politicians want to be generals,
and our generals want to be politicians, and neither are
calling the shots.

I don't judge Colin Powell harshly, that's a tough call.

What did he know, and when did he know it?

Our professional soldiers are put in the position to
fight what ever war... just, or unjust, our politicians
hand them.

And that's why I feel Admiral Fallon exhibited the very
highest order of patriotism.

Here's someone else who exhibited the highest order of patriotism,
he was a two-time winner of the Medal of Honor, and at the
time of his death, was the most decorated Marine in US history,
his name was Major General, Smedley Butler.

And he wrote a book that should be mandatory reading on an
annual basis for every officer in the military. And it should
be read by every civilian who supports sending our sons and
daughters off to war.

It's called - "War Is A Racket."

scribd.com

It connects all the dots between what Professor Carroll Quigley
and Anthony Sutton have written, and the conflicts that America's
modern military leaders like General Colin Powell, and Admiral
William Fallon now face.

And here's it's most famous and important quote:

"I spent 33 years and 4 months in active military service,
and during that period I spent most of my time as a 'high-class
muscle man' for big business, Wall Street, and the bankers. In
short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism."



MajGen Smedley Butler USMC

Two Time Medal of Honor Recipient,
And the most decorated Marine in USMC history.*


Hawk, in all due respect, as America is about to be pushed
into yet another unjust war, this one potentially both nuclear,
and global in scope, I'd highly encourage you to become one
of Eisenhower's "alert and knowledgeable citizens," instead
of a mindless puppet spewing the talking points of those who
JFK and Eisenhower warned us about, and whom Quigley and
Sutton have taught us about.

Twice before, the globalists have created "the war to end all wars"
in order to bring in global governance. Let's not give them a third
opportunity.

SOTB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext