Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: greenspirit who wrote (369985)	6/23/2010 10:30:27 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 793956

Reading the Rolling Stone article again and very closely, it becomes obvious that the McChrystal quotes do not add up to a firing offense, do not constitute insubordination, and are not the sort of occasion for other than the rebuke that Secretary Gates delivered this morning Mark Levin had the same reaction. It's a lawyer's reaction -- they read the piece and noticed that the direct quotes added up to nothing. But in the larger scheme, it doesn't matter -- the damage is done by the whole article. If 9/10 of the article is a journalist making a mountain out of a molehill, it wouldn't be the first time.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next