Here it is. I'm going to do a "special" on it as a treat to my long term suffering camp followers.
To: ahhaha who wrote (57014) 6/25/2010 1:07:48 PM
From: Winfastorlose 2 Recommendations of 57021
Out of deference to da_cheif this is my last comment on the matter.
Notice the low sloping forehead. Indicates stupidity. Should make a good stuffed display for the museum.
Now why would anyone be ranked dead last by that idiot Hulbert if he simply has been telling people to buy the physical metal since 1999 and put it away for 2011
Hulbert ranked him last because Sinclair tried to trade around his thesis on his "hot line", and lost heavily.
and the metal is currently sitting at all time highs and has set new recovery highs and then all time highs almost every year for the last 11?
I had already stated why gold had been in a bull market. What you are doing is reinforcing your quaint, false, hack amateur, belief that past price predicts future price. That's the hallmark of a loser. The brokerage houses know this full well. If you were any kind of pro, you'd know it too.
Furthermore he has always told people not to trade the metal but to buy it, take delivery, and hold it through the swings because it would see all time highs that no one would want to miss in 2011.
Then why should one pay him for a subscription to his expensive service? If what you say above is true, you'd have to be a fool to do so.
I think you are talking total BS because as I have said I have followed his comments for many years.
Why bother? Do you need to have your hand held, pro?
The truth is that Sinclair has been right on.
It should be clear to any casual observer that you can't discern the truth, liar.
Prior to 99, he was telling people not to expect a whole lot out of gold for the short term and had been relatively bearish on the precious metals for many years.
Well, boy, now that is a lie, and I know the truth. The guy was bullish on gold during the entire horrible 20 year bear market.
I'm sorry, but I am a career market professional too and it seems to me that you are on the clueless side.
No. you aren't. You're just another liar. What house do you work for? Did you know that NO house will allow its employees to chat? No doubt a few low level employees hide in Yahoo boards, but no broker would.
If you have not been following the debate on the OTC derivatives question both here and in Europe (particularly Germany) then maybe you are a professional in some other kind of "stock" market than the financial markets?
This sentence is non sequitur. The conclusion is unconnected to the premises. Be that as it may, what you know about derivatives or the derivative market, is shit zero. Proof: the derivative market isn't at issue with sovereign debt. The bond market is. Two different animals.
One last thing. Sinclair has never claimed gold rises through fear. He has always said sustained gold price moves are the result of monetary events that have to do with debasement of fiat currencies.
What an idiot. You're saying that the debasement of currencies doesn't cause fear? Fear was a succinct way to encapsulate the whole Sinclair Gold Bug thesis without going into all the aspects you loons have dreamed up. Is your puny intellect so weak that you missed that? I'm seeing a repeated MO where your lying and stupidity coupled with sub standard intelligence, has got you into a fully bagable position. It is altogether proper and fitting that that should be the case.
Now My advice to you is to study up a little the next time you decide to post something unless you like to come off sounding like an uneducated scamp.
Anyone here think I need to "study up"? What I need to do is rewrite many of the wiki articles in finance, but I won't do it. The public deserves to know the myths that reinforce their failure and poverty. |
