Olympus Ventures (OVIS) - The Naysayers Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Olympus Ventures (OVIS) - The Naysayers

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (312)	11/7/1997 11:35:00 AM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) of 336

Shareholder of Rocky Mountain International Ltd. (RMIL) Sued by Admitted Short Seller because the stock price rose rather than sank. Contact the company for further details. Gary Morgan or Roland Breton at 954-565-9292 -------- Riley G, an individual investor of Rocky Mountain International Ltd. (RMIL) responds to the press release issued Nov. 4, 1997 by Dempsey Mork After being served a summons of complaint in United States District Court, Central District of California. Case number: EDCV-97-300 RT (VAPx). I, Riley G, am the individual investor that started a grass roots movement in Rocky Mountain International Ltd. (RMIL) after uncovering some 2 to 5 million extra shares in the RMIL market. These EXTRA shares are in the market due to the abusive short selling by well-capitalized trading firms and individuals attempting to profit from market manipulation rather than company and market fundamentals. I recommend to shareholders that they take physical delivery of their stock certificates. When physical delivery of stock certificates is demanded by a significant number of shareholders, the creators of nonexistent stock can be squeezed. The short sellers won't have stock certificates to deliver and thus they will cause losses for them and will cause them to move their undeclared short activities elsewhere. We are not talking about legal shorting, we are talking about blatant selling of nonexistent shares to flood the market. Thus keeping the price of a stock down and to terminal short it at the same time. If a terminal short is made (stock value = $0) then the shorts or market makers never have to worry about coving their shorts or extra shares that they flooded the market with. This is why every shareholder must demand delivery of their certificates! Call me, Riley G, the shareholder that has been served legal notice (summons) by one of the admitted short sellers. 718-331-1960

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next