SSA (SSAX) BPCS/Client Server Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SSA (SSAX) BPCS/Client Server

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Richard Jurek who wrote (271)	11/7/1997 11:59:00 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (1) of 915

Chk UR attitude @ t'door, Jurek...MY PT=Take worst case scenario, factor $$ into "forward looking B/S footnotes", divide by current shares outstanding and voila...anticipated hit to earnings. I AM STILL OF THE FIRM POSITION: these 2 financing sources, read UNDERWRITERS normally sue to get expense money. Tis done all the time. If SSAX didn't think it made financial sense to switch to H&Q for underwriting, they wouldn't have done it! They were advised by H&Q as to what "expenses" might be. I'm not as green as you think in the ways of stocks. I just don't always understand TECHNONERD descriptive talk in product/company slicks or Websites, even tho' I read it ALL! If it helps, I'll give you an "E-" for effort.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next