Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: LindyBill	7/8/2010 11:52:56 PM
	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 793936

The gays don't want these kind of decisions for precisely the reason stated. An amendment to the Constitution on Marriage would pass without a problem. Defense of Marriage Act Decision [William Duncan] The Boston decision lacks seriousness. The judge answered a question that wasn't being asked. He says the 14th Amendment requires that marriage be redefined, but the question was whether Massachusetts had to follow federal law in administering federal programs. This decision is a good argument for a federal amendment defining marriage.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next