SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 174.45+1.7%1:01 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: matherandlowell who wrote (93218)7/19/2010 9:52:03 AM
From: ihavenoidea8 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 196595
 
Let me offer a single voice of dissent here

You can't kid a kidder. There's plenty of shareholders on this board that still steadfastly support this management team. At least I would like to give you credit for putting forth rationale for that support. I didn't know Q doubled their cash in that period. Which scares me even more about this management team. Thus, Q's cash should have at least tripled to $30B; if it had been managed correctly-or at least be $25B. I don't need to outline all the sour investments that has dragged the cash down from $30B to $20B: but these come quickly to mind: Qualcomm Ventures, which started a $500M investment fund. I don't even know if QVI is around anymore.Certainly the investments have no significant ROI.Other investments: Snaptrack, that's a billion, Globastar-who knows, Broadcomm - that's a billion when u add the settlement and legal fees together, Triginex which Q bought in 2004, and at the end of last year announced that the last 45 engineers remaining in the company were being made "redundent"; Q chat - Sprint announced at the end of last year that no new Q-chat handsets were on the product development map; Media-flow-sunk costs certainly over a billion now (but given a chance for some return on the principal); mirasol -altho the jury is out, I don't give it much chance to be profitable for years to come; reduced royalty rates negotiated by the management team-billions; excessive compensation to sr. management in the form of salary, bonus, stock grants and options-hundreds of millions, excessive IR&D expenditures, etc. ......this should be enough to get me a few more "ignores". Actually the best I can hope for is that Q goes back to its roots,spins off QCT & QLT to a suitor with a capable management team and lets QWI and QSI stay behind with Dr. Paul Jacobs and a few billion with which to play. Qualcomm and its management were extremely effective when they were a small-even a mid-cap company. Now they are a mature company, bureacratically run, desperately needing a transfusion (divestiture), or at least new blood (spin-off). There is absolutely no way the Qualcomm board headed by Jacobs and run by both Jacobs are going to replace Dr. Paul Jacobs and his management team. It's very difficult for a father to admit his mistakes. Irvin maybe defied the laws of physics, but he can't overcome the mistakes of human nature. i.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext