SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 174.600.0%2:09 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim Mullens who wrote (93491)7/22/2010 9:49:37 PM
From: Maurice Winn3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 196641
 
Jim, if somebody comes past my house and tells me it's only worth half what it was at the irrational peak, I don't really care because it still does exactly what it did before. If somebody tells me my QCOM is worth only $32 a share instead of the $57 it was, I'm indifferent [except that I might buy another Tonka Truckload to add to my fleet] - provided of course that it's not because the sales and profits have been dropping.

Your whiners shouldn't have paid so much for their investments aka houses with debt in many instances. <millions of small / average investors who lost their shirts in the 50% meltdown- IRA / Pension funds/ savings plans/ kids college plans wiped-out, retirement delayed- out of question. Got any idea how many pension plans are in dire straits >

This discussion is getting off Qualcomm. It started because Paul Jacobs answered a question from you to the effect that high speed [or velocity] trading wasn't in keeping with motherhood and apple pie or something.

More importantly, what's he going to do about the stash of cash and handing it over to the rightful owners [who are not the employees who are paid in cash and future profits represented by share price] before Obama gets hold of it with the canceled dividend tax cuts?

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext