SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (44420)7/28/2010 5:19:33 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Your statement applied to ALL trends. Adding "particuarly large ones" doesn't change that, it just suggest that the point applies to an even greater degree for such trends. You would have had to make your statement something like "only large ones.." to have that effect, but you did not.

So your statement is wrong unless every single trend had fluctuations, not just "large ones, data series, involving large human populations".

More importantly even if your statement was correct, and every single trend of any nature, size, duration, or direction, had fluctuations, your point would still be irrelevant.

A trend, in this case one that fits under your "large ones, data series, involving large human populations" category, can have all sorts of fluctuations, in different directions, of different sizes, over different time scales, but it still is not itself a fluctuation, so talking about it is not talking about "demographic fluctuations".
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext