SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (579076)8/8/2010 12:35:29 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) of 1578144
 
"CJ, I'm not too concerned about the supposed loss of atmospheric oxygen (which wasn't quantified at all by your link)."

Changing the subject?

Again?

And wrong, to boot.

"So the total estimated industrial O2 depletion on Jan 1, 2005 would have been (35.3)/(37050)x100 = 0.095% of the preindustrial amount."

blogcritics.org

Sounds like it was quantified to me. Or, are you using some novel meaning of "quantified"?

The topic under discussion was your mathematical "analysis" of the decline in phytoplankton in the oceans. It was classic GIGO. You made certain implied assumptions that were, at best, faulty. And then used your "results" to smear others.

With a residence time of 4500 years for oxygen, even if all of the phytoplankton were to stop producing oxygen today, the O2 in the atmosphere would decline by about 0.009% per year.

So you were projecting, again, when you posted

That was a little trick I like to call "math." Something the arrogant libtards still refuse to learn.

Message 26718189

Of course, no doubt, you and your wingtard buddies will be butt slapping each other on how you took me down on this...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext