TJ: if by west you mean china, you could be correct about nigeria
Yes, China does contribute greatly to Africa, which further proves my point that sub-Saharan Africa is highly-dependent on external assistance for their very survival.
The assistance that the United States gives to sub-Saharan Africa is also vast.
usaid.gov
usaid.gov
In summary, Nigeria exists as a leech on U.S. taxpayers. Their continued existence is facilitated, as I said before, by the wealthiest Whites with the most weapons at their command.
TJ: still, the discussion was: would a nigerian be adaptable enough to survive where you are, and can you make do at where he is from. answer, yes, and no, respectively, and so, per darwin guidelines, one of you is wanting per survival imperative, and i fear that one is you.
Darwin's ideas were based on naturally occurring events and natural selection. Nigerians are artificially maintained at the discretion of the wealthiest Whites with the most weapons at their command. The arrangement is decidedly unnatural, artificial, and not permanent.
Without external intervention from superior societies, Nigerians would not survive outside of Nigeria, and their survival prospects in their own country would be much bleaker. In fact, they could easily be conquered or permanently erased.
TJ: if you intend to get engaged with debate, a little knowledge gathering might be helpful
When I engage in a debate, I give my opponent the benefit of the doubt that he will make a logical argument. So far, you have failed to do so. |
