SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dybdahl who wrote (18833)8/16/2010 8:30:37 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
Even if damage was not a possibility, the freedom to control access and use of your own property is a huge value.

Which is not to say that its always and everywhere under any circumstances a value that overwhelms all others. It isn't. But it is an important value.

A couple of good examples on restrictions on what I can decide on the property on which my house stands:

There are also restriction in the US. I might be ok with (reasonable) safety rules and building codes, but other than those type of rules I think generally how you build your house should be none of the government's business (again that's generally, not always under every circumstance).

In the US some of the type of rules your talking about would be a matter of private contract, with a home owner's association being associated with the house and with part of the contracts when you buy the house being a contract that you accept their rules. I have less problem with that to the extent it allows for diversity of the rules, but I'm not actually a big fan of some of what HOAs do.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext