SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (45269)8/26/2010 2:49:22 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Re: "they are apparently ignored in the actual estimate."

Right.

Because the dynamical and the standard static economic models returned approximately the SAME BOTTOM LINE NUMBERS.

And because:

A) As was measured over the full course of the decade just past.

B) And as was PREDICTED BY ALL THREE of Bush's macro econometric studies at the beginning of his first term (CBO, GAO and Trend Macrolytics, the "dynamical analysis") returned approximately the same numbers.

That's why.

(And they made that clear in the footnote: no significant difference.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News