SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 50% Gains Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL who wrote (93486)8/28/2010 7:48:52 PM
From: Bridge PlayerRead Replies (2) of 118717
 
You said:

With a couple of steps we could take a lot of the manufacturing back to our shores.

1) Cut oil imports, via using more NG, nuclear and coal; and
2) let the exchange rate drop.


From the U.S. Energy Information Administration, August 2010 Edition:

eia.doe.gov

Year-to-date, coal-fired plants contributed 46.3 percent of the power generated in the United States. Natural gas-fired plants contributed 21.2 percent, and nuclear plants contributed 20.3 percent. Of the 0.9 percent contributed by petroleum-fired plants, petroleum liquids represented 0.5 percent, with the remainder from petroleum coke. Conventional hydroelectric sources provided 6.6 percent of the total, while other renewables (biomass, geothermal, solar, and wind) and other miscellaneous energy sources generated the remaining 4.4 percent of electric power (Figure 2).

So, we have as percentages of fuel source used in power generation, 2010 to date:

Coal: 46.3%
Nat gas: 21.2%
Nuclear: 20.3%
Hydroele: 6.6%
Renewable: 4.4%
Petroleum: 0.9%
------------------
Total: 99.7
(e.g. 0.3% rounding errors)

It is not clear to me how increasing the usage of natural gas, nuclear, and coal in power generation will help cut our oil imports in any meaningful way.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext