SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FMK who wrote (1307)11/9/1997 5:55:00 PM
From: webpilot  Read Replies (1) of 27311
 
FMK, I don't know the answers. Reading through the resumes of their top level management and their extensive background in actual manufacturing, I would think that they would have anticipated any potential problem. Perhaps the problem was with the computer. It was described as a preproduction model. That could mean anything. As a stockholder I would be more interested in when this problem occured. If it happened months ago, I am sure the problem has been rectified, and the comments in the article would be meaningless. I have tried on many occasions to try to pry information regarding the lithium polymers from ULBI. Under no circumstance do you have any chance to gain anything from them. They are absolutely closed mouthed. As it should be. Very tight security indeed. In complete contrast to the loose lips over at Mitsubishi as quoted in the PC Weekly article that I read. I didn't think that the Mitsubishi corporate culture did business that way. They have nothing to gain by making such statements and will only tarnish their image. Why upset your strategic partners by making damaging statements to third parties such as trade magazines or anyone else. It just doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Large, successful corporations just don't do business this way.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext