SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (35387)9/2/2010 2:47:05 PM
From: ftth  Read Replies (1) of 46821
 
Not my opposing view on sensing, but here's one from Shared Spectrum Corp:

"With regard to TV White Spaces reconsideration issues in particular, we stressed the importance of retaining a sensing requirement, at least as an alternative interference avoidance mechanism, for television band devices (TVBDs).

The elimination of the sensing requirement altogether would impact deployment of un-tethered or ad hoc networks and it should be left up to the marketplace to choose which interference avoidance approach, or both, provides the best performance and protection.

Spectrum sensing data could also provide a valuable, independent check on the accuracy of localized information
regarding protected operations contained in or missing from the geolocation database or in the likely case where the geolocation of the TVBDs cannot be accurately determined (e.g., indoors).

We also raised questions about recent speculative and unsupported assertions that sensing would be too costly to make TVBD deployment economical, especially since SSC’s sensing approach is completely software based.
At the same time, we note that the marginal cost of implementing the geolocation requirements (including
the fees charged by database managers) is currently unknown."

snipped from:
fjallfoss.fcc.gov

related presentation:
fjallfoss.fcc.gov
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext