"A friend of mine" ??? Come on Raw, you'll have to do better than that. This is no better than the usual unsubstantiated fiction such as that the media credits accounting is in compliance with GAAP.
Posted by: Steady_T Date: Friday, September 03, 2010 9:16:15 PM
In reply to: righty who wrote msg# 68839 Post # of 68861
I talked to DEC this afternoon.
The stack test was conducted on Aug 17th.
Eyeball results of the data monitors as the data was collected was good. The final results will come back in reports after data analysis and data normalization.
The particulate test filters had nothing visible to the naked eye. That is way good.
3 different type of plastics were run. I didn't find out what they were.
DEC expects to receive the reports back very soon. There is a EPA annual reporting deadline coming up that is consuming much time for DEC and the labs that do the analysis. This happens every year. That may be why it has taken this long to get the reports back.
CRA and IsleChem are both involved in the permit application. There have been some people out on vacations.
DEC may require additional stack testing AFTER the permit is issued. They will decide that after the formal reports are presented in the application.
There were no issues raised by the stack test upon preliminary examination of the data.
My conclusion is that the application will be approved when submitted. The data suggests that the stack gasses look like a regular boiler gasses. The preliminary look at NOX, SOX, CO were that of a well controlled boiler.
Fill in your own pump here .............
siliconinvestor.com
Posted by: Jahuel Date: Friday, September 03, 2010 11:54:22 PM
In reply to: Steady_T who wrote msg# 68843 Post # of 68861
Heck yeah! Has anyone else validated this info?
siliconinvestor.com
Posted by: Rawnoc Date: Saturday, September 04, 2010 1:11:36 AM
In reply to: Jahuel who wrote msg# 68854 Post # of 68861
A friend of mine validated with a similar conversation to the DEC emailed me today and ask me to respond to this post with his detils. He said he read the post asking if anybody else validated it and wanted me to respond since he doesn't have as much time for the boards as I do (lol). I've known him for around 10 years so I trust his info.
Anyway, yes, he received similar info.
Additional info from the DEC:
1. JBII's process is a "completely green process" (their words)
2. They've never seen anything like it.
3. JBII will be the first and only ones in the country with anything like this.
4. The DEC is extremely excited to have a new industry born in New York and under their watch.
5. DEC expects no further hiccups going forward in getting the permit (their words).
6. They expect future permit applications to be a breeze in the state of New York (their words). They expect, but cannot promise of course, that getting permits in most other states will also be easy because most of them have similar criteria and can use their data.
7. The same guys from the DEC who have been on site working with them are the same guys who are involved with processing the application. They don't see anything wrong with the process or they themselves would ahve spotted it.
8. They expect NO comment period because the emission levels they expect in the report to be substantially below the levels that would require a comment period.
9. They have seen numerous others try and every single one of them fail to do what JBII is doing. None of them even made it to the stack test stage because they failed so miserably sooner whereas JBII not only made it, but preliminary data suggests they passed with flying colors.
siliconinvestor.com
Posted by: Rev Kilgore Mullet Date: Saturday, September 04, 2010 7:01:56 AM
In reply to: Rawnoc who wrote msg# 68855 Post # of 68861
"A friend of mine" ??? Come on Raw, you'll have to do better than that. This is no better than the usual unsubstantiated fiction such as that the media credits accounting is in compliance with GAAP.
siliconinvestor.com |
