The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Peter Ecclesine who wrote (35467)	9/5/2010 9:59:43 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine	Read Replies (1) of 46821

Hi All, On the difficulty of sensing all the equipment that License holders are allowed to use: FCC Part 74 are mostly video services gpo.gov Part 74 Subpart H Low Power Auxiliary Stations 74.870 Wireless Video Assist Devices, which allow radio links of unspecified modulation between TV cameras and recording consoles. (d) Wireless video assist devices are limited to a maximum of 250 milliwatts ERP and must limit power to that necessary to reliably receive a signal at a distance of 300 meters. Wireless video assist devices must comply with the emission limitations of § 74.637 [which are power limits] . No particular modulation waveform is required. . . How can anyone reliably sense whether the devices are being used by valid license holders, (about half of the Part 74 licenses are lapsed ;-) ), or the responsible parties do not enjoy protection?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next