The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ftth who wrote (35499)	9/5/2010 7:00:44 PM
From: Peter Ecclesine	Read Replies (1) of 46821

Hi ftth, >>So, "validity" as an administrative attribute lends itself to a database query solution, but I'm not sure it's perfectly reliable either. However it seems it is the most plausible near-ideal in the case of identifying valid devices at fixed locations. But what happens when you add valid mobile devices to the mix? Doesn't sensing provide a second-level "electromagnetic attribute" verification that a database alone is not capable of meeting? << In radar bands, devices that do not emit the harmonized signals (e.g., cruise missiles) do not enjoy protection. The responsible parties for mobile operation will enter their mobile operation parameters into the database by which they enjoy protection. "Validity" comes from statutes and rules, not technology. petere

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next