SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VVUS: VIVUS INC. (NASDAQ)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bradpalm1 who wrote (2243)11/9/1997 9:12:00 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Read Replies (2) of 23519
 
Braddy, I got to your post. Braddy you either don't get it or pretend not to get it: both are bad though.Tell you why:

You galloped in this thread ( from AOL Motley Fool were you have the amateur investors none of whom, from what I saw,was able to see through you and challenge your pseudoscience ); you came here I was saying, asserting tha a) you were a physician
b) an internist too ( one of the most broadly skilled specialists in Medicine c) and that you were treatig ED for 4 years.

That indicates a HIGH degree of knowledge in the ED field.

However after a few of your posts I immediately started smelling a rat. I didn't say anything however because I don't like to make accusations without proof.Sp I waited.I knw that sooner or later,
the truth would surface.

And now, with your post # 1262, the cat is out of the bag.

So no, Braddy.we don't have a deal. If the deal means calling you an MD when you are not, we do not have a deal.I don't think anybody else in this thread would either, except perhaps Leo, gg.

And for those in Rio Linda who are saying, " why, why can't we all gat along ", the reason is simple: this is fraud: it is illegel too: impersonating somebody for the faudulent acquiring wealth: in this case trying to scare Vivus shareholders in this thread into dumping their shares at submatket values so you , Leo and the rest of the 9 mill shorted shares can dig yourselves out of the hole you got yourselves in.

You have so far chosen not to answer the mega innaccurracy in post
#1262.

I will give you another chance and a clue.
YOUR posted figures are wrong in terms of the number of diabetics in the USA who have ED and who need therapy.

I will state later why this figure is EXTREMELY important in Ed.
For now you can do one of two things:
a) If you feel the figure is correct, then gives a reference ( a standard medical textbook in the field will do thank you ).
b) if you feel that you made a mistake, then do some research ( for
a change, ) and give us the corect figure.In this case however you'll need to tell us also why you did not acknowledge your mistake sooner and mislead this thraed all these last 3 - 4 days.

TA
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext