SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.20+0.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ali Chen who wrote (39743)11/9/1997 10:15:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Ali-
<Oh, thank you, thank you very much:-) Of course, if you have no background to access the problem by yourself, you would rely on this junk press citing "unnamed" "BIOS experts" and "heavily guarded" undocumented technology. >

Ali, can't you read? There was an interview with an Intel marketing
representative who was identified by name and he confirmed the
existance of the reprogrammable microcode, it's all there in the
links I posted. All you have to do is read it...
The feature that you insisted couldn't possibly exist is there.
Aren't you tired of getting embarrassed like this? Don't you long for
winning just once in a while? If you weren't so obsessed with Intel
bashing then perhaps you could think clearly enough to present a
defendable case. Why not respond to the major K6 bugs. They are bugs
involving legal code and worse than the Intel FPU bug that resulted
in a $500 million recall. You are avoiding the subject because you
are caught with your pants down. You brought up the issue of bugs and
now you have no answer regarding the many many documented K6 bugs. Put up or shut up Ali. Address the K6 bugs or stop bashing Intel for
illegal code operation.

Major documented AMD bugs admitted by AMD.

techweb.com

EP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext