SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (45860)9/13/2010 5:36:16 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
said he would support extending those reductions for the middle class but not the wealthy, if that was his only choice.

I find that unfortunate but its somewhat understandable. The Democrats have the advantage here in that they can have the tax increase they want without needing to win any vote. Unless the Republicans can get some democratic support all they can do is prevent a Democratic effort to limit the extent of the tax increase (in terms of how many people it directly impacts). Even if the Republicans manage to win both houses of congress, extending the tax cut or making it permanent would need Obama's signature (or an override of his veto, but I don't see the Republicans gaining enough seats to do that. If the Republicans do hold out against any tax increase its possible that they could win, but they might not, and it seems Boehner isn't confident enough to take the chance.

Its too bad that the Democrats have to play to divisions, trying to pit rich against poor, or give benefits based on racial, sex/gender, or other status.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext