The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: axial who wrote (35614)	9/14/2010 3:27:50 AM
From: axial	Read Replies (1) of 46821

Typical incumbent behavior -- not limited to telecoms... "This is but one example of many where incumbents claim service improvement is too costly, yet spend freely to maintain monopoly status and substandard service to captured clients." --- Deadly Priorities: Why Did PG&E Spend Millions on Politics, Instead of Pipelines? "We know the utility had the money -- our money -- to fix the pipelines because public filings show that just last spring, PG&E chose to spend $45 million in ratepayer dollars in a failed bid to block public power. These are funds that could have been used to repair what the utility's own survey said was a high risk pipeline on the SF peninsula. So why make the decision for politics not pipelines? If the spending decisions were not related, why not? At the very least, PG&E should have a moratorium on political spending until they compensate the San Bruno victims and fix the pipelines." huffingtonpost.com Jim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next