Wow, this thread is getting really bizarre.
What does "net neutrality" have to do with wireless mics? Well, net neutrality is the regulation of internet content to make sure that ISPs pass pR0n uploads and camcordered movies. And wireless mics, while strictly private and not part of service-provider networks of any sort, use the radio spectrum to carry voice across a room. That voice might be part of an "adult" production, and that could be like soft-core pR0n too, so is that the nexus? Or maybe it's that wireless mics are used in theaters, and those shows are sometimes illegally camcordered and then uploaded to the Internet for darknet distribution, which is protected via network neutrality. So surely the mics have to give way to pR0n distribution via wireless Internet access, right?
Plus, wireless mics are "wireless", and we're talking about making more radio frequencies (which our grandpappies called "wireless" during the Coolidge administration) available for unwired Internet access. So they must be the same thing, right? And I guess ClearChannel has to make its radio stations available for anyone to say anything on, since programming them themselves violates the end-to-end principle of user-controlled best-effort network neutrality, or some such crazy buzzword stew.
Yes, I'm being facetious. Let's not conflate things. Internet policy and spectrum management policy are two different things, even though they have a sort of supplier-user relationship.
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-TA57L0kuc[/url] |
