SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (35682)9/15/2010 12:46:56 AM
From: fred g  Read Replies (2) of 46821
 
Frank, if you slapped a few IP protocols beneath the voice application layer in a wireless mic, you'd have a phallic doorstop. Not a microphone.

Packetization necessarily adds delay. Mics require negligible delay -- a millisecond, maybe, but not what IP does. Even VoIP phone calls are seriously impaired by the packetization delay, and they don't have to play in time with the music, or in harmony with each other. It's just the wrong solution to the problem.

Wireless mics are different from web browsers and other delay-tolerant applications, the kind eye pee was made to support. They need real-time non-delayed connections. FM is perfect. PCM or even high-rate ADPCM audio works too, if not packetized. Can this be cognitive? I dunno... I have my doubts though. It can't take time off to listen around the spectrum.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News