The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (35734)	9/17/2010 4:41:02 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation of 46821

When you write "labour" crossing a border, it isn't actually labour which crosses a border. It's a 75kg lump of wet chemistry closely related to chimps. I have no idea why such a monster should have the same regulatory controls as a bit or even a byte. <capital (and that includes intellectual capital which includes "bits") should have freedom to cross any given border with the exact same regulatory ease with which labor is allowed to cross that same border - > I have very different regulations for large primates entering my house than I do for bytes. Bytes don't bite for a start and their toilet habits are impeccable. They don't get into the refrigerator, or try to mate with my daughters. Why should countries have the same regulations for "labour" as bytes? Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next