Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (383195)	9/18/2010 9:30:30 AM
From: MrLucky	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 794283

I think Rove thinks that O'Donnell is flaky, the kind of candidate you are better off without because she's a time bomb; any moment the scandal could occur and of course the media will be gunning for her. I wonder if Rove thought Scozzafava (sic) was flaky when she tossed her support to the democrat. I wonder if he thought Castle's lack of support for the Bush surge in Iraq was flaky. Krauthammer has been long in the beltway and he has a very analytical approach. Palin's appeal is emotional, aesthetic, charismatic; not Charles' cup of tea. He's catching on slowly. One would hope that Dr. Krauthammer's lengthy period in the Beltway would have caused him to finally figure out, that it was the charisma of JFK, RR, WJC and GWB (versus "wood block Gore" and the Kerry "who served in Vietnam") that won the presidency, not their Adlai Stevenson intelligence. I think Rove and Krauthammer will both be happy to acknowledge they were wrong if O'Donnell wins. I agree, but seriously doubt it will change their thinking about how the GOP should function as a party. They have been in the Beltway far too long, as have many others in the republican party.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next