back to:
<<... Lao Mong Hay, ... Asian Human Rights Commission in Hong Kong>>
... that would be freedom hong kong to you.
<<... According to Mong Hay, China had donated $1 billion to Democratic Kampuchea before 1979 and another billion dollars after 1979 in order to fight the Vietnamese invasion...>>
... helping cambodians to defend against american and vietnamese invaders was wrong? or that cambodia spawned the only organized pol pot force to do so was china's fault? or that it was right for america and vietnam to invade cambodia? what is your spin?
<<... All nations (including the US), in pursuing their economic and security interests, are guilty of engaging in policies that have resulted in oppression and/or genocide, even if at a localized, tribal, level. We must accept the blame for that..>>
.. you singularly fail to do so. in truth you champion more, and much more of the same, and is proud to do so.
For China to mature into becoming a responsible member of the international community, they must, as well, accept their responsibility where their policies have led to atrocities by their client states.
.. so what is your excuse for team usa's failure to mature?
... Ultimately, being a non-democratic government, China also has no interest in promoting pluralist government. Bejing's only agenda is regional influence and economic exploitation.
... meaningless gibberish given that team america is responsible for most of the influence peddling and economic exploitation around the world via its military and fiat currency. you were trying to be funny, yes?
And isn't it also ironic that Bejing, seeing democracy as not critical for their society, freely benefits from it in the democratic UN, with the power to veto any resolution to boot.
... and so now you are blaming the chinese for convoluting the non-demo structuring of the un, or are you upset that team usa, having convoluted the non-demo structuring of the un has lost some degree of control over the processing?
let us see what happens next re the similarly convoluted imf.
you really have no shame.
<<Now go away and don't bother this thread with your ramblings and delusional historical inaccuracies.>>
... oh, yes, great hamoon, i think i shall think about obeying your command of the situation and way of engaging with differing views.
thought over. no intention to stand down on all of your stance re echelon, invasions, killings, and interpretation of histories, and never mind your mind over macro this and investment that.
certainly appears that you are having a trying time alignming your stories and calibrating your utterings.
what fun. |
