SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (144784)9/20/2010 1:47:59 PM
From: Little Joe  Read Replies (2) of 543113
 
f you're convinced that the Supreme Court might allow the establishment of Sharia Courts by interpreting the Constitution bizarrely, why do you think having Congress pass a law to prevent that would help? The Supreme Court could rule that law was unconstitutional.

You are correct and that was acknowledged in my post. But the law could have some inhibiting effect on the court's desire to move in that direction.

'At present, if two muslims (or anyone else for that matter) have a civil dispute, and they want to resolve it by going before a Sharia Court, they would have that right, just as two Catholics could ask a priest to mediate a disagreement. But no Sharia Court presently has the right to prosecute criminal matters, which are the sole province of the constitutionally established judicial system. That is true here, and it's true in the UK, for example, where Sharia Courts have been allowed to adjudicate civil matters only."

The situation is much less clear than you claim.

foxnews.com

The fact is that Muslims in England claim the right to resolve Divorce cases, Domestic Violence Cases and criminal cases. The Government apparently claims this is illegal, but according to this article it is happening.

lj
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext