SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SteveF who wrote (2391)9/28/2010 8:57:36 AM
From: scionRead Replies (1) of 53574
 
I do not need EPA registration to sell fuel. I do not understand the emphasis to sell fuel for cars in the US. Like everything else, due to our clean fuel and size of our company, it would not be a problem but why spend any time on that now when there is plenty of low hanging fruit...

techisbest Share Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:06:27 AM
Re: None Post # of 71204

Correspondence from JB regarding selling P2O fuel...

I received email correspondence from John in answer to my questions about registering P2O fuel with the EPA. He has given me permission to post this:
Quote:
We do not have the EPA in Canada and the fuel will be sold here. We own a permitted blending site. In Canada , we must pay a % tax to the provincial and federal government depending on how the fuel is used (road, industrial, farm, etc.)

Blending sites in Canada are permitted to distribute and sell fuel they blend. We do not have to register with the EPA. If our fuel is sold back to the US (this is common) then the importer (buyer) has the same state and federal requirements as any other gas station or distribution site.

-----

BTW, a MSDS sheet had to be created for the output of the processor. This was required to import into Canada. [techisbest note: I believe MSDS is a Material Data Safety Sheet]

-----

You can post publicly. I suggest shareholders contact the EPA to get straight answers to refute any misinformation campaign.

The environmental agencies have been very supportive of our technology. They allowed us to build our proprietary process (large scale) with the existing air permits and stack at the factory. They further allowed us to run to test, run steady state, test, and rerun to iron out any bugs (with a temporary permit issued in hours). Further, the environmental agencies have reviewed the technology and allowed it to run through a stack test to gather data for a commercial permit. The stack test results proved the machine does not pollute. It's 100% stupidity that the EPA would hold up fuel sales and exports knowing that our fuel has less sulphur in it than fuel at the pump, that they have been very flexible with us to prove our technology is clean and works.

I do not need EPA registration to sell fuel. I do not understand the emphasis to sell fuel for cars in the US. Like everything else, due to our clean fuel and size of our company, it would not be a problem but why spend any time on that now when there is plenty of low hanging fruit ( ie: factories, rail, ships, thousands of farms all of whom consume vast amounts of diesel and other fuels), all of Canada, and any ship that sails by in the Great Lakes. Then, consider international ships, generators, and thousands of factories.

I suspect that if EPA registration of our fuel is critical to some people then maybe they somehow believe we will saturate the world market with diesel so much so that we would have nowhere left to sell it but to vehicles operated exclusively in the United States.

siliconinvestor.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext