Evolution Message Board - Msg: 26885061

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (9230)	10/13/2010 3:26:50 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) of 69300

The point he's making is not nearly as complicated as you imagine. He explicitly says: <<"I'm not trying to persuade you of a particular religious point of view; I'm trying to get you to think of ultimate issues and ultimate questions in a particular way.">> "Perspective is bound, at least in part, on bias. He concludes his perspective or some related perspective must be true, and on the basis of mutual exclusivity must then render other perspectives to be false." So you seem to want to argue that logically contradictory and mutually exclusive statements can both be true. Is that correct? I would love to see you explain that. "He further implies a very general statement regarding Jesus covers the absolute truth of the matter." No that's not the point at all. In fact he quite clearly states that: "One of us must be wrong, at bare minimum. Maybe we both are. But one thing that we can never say is that we're both right."

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next