A prime example is the the way you took heated issue with the article I posted ...
siliconinvestor.com
This is a prime example alright. A prime example of you misrepresenting my post, unless you can show how this prime example post is 'taking heated issue,' you have just confirmed once again the basis (not bare assertion) for your reputation as a hypocritical fraud.
I took heated issue??? Quite to the contrary the post you targeted is rational, logically recognizing the basis of logic in the article, while rationally explaining the author's flaw of contagion. Your author's example was not convincing and I went to some lengths to demonstrate why that is the case. I recognized in my post how a truth may be absolute and uncompromisable, while demonstrating how in practical circumstances two apposing statements may not actually be mutually exclusive. Statements such as 'Jesus is God' are subject to view points. View points are subject to individual knowledge bases, circumstance, experience, and awareness which would have to be at an omniscient level to draw the conclusion you and your author have promoted, that Christians should not be cowardly in standing behind such a declaration as uncompromisable and mutually exclusive fact. You didn't remain in the logic mode of the discussion and instead preferred to attack me personally, which is where every attempt at rational discussion with you has ended to date.
-------------
In addition you just completely skirted over the context and essence of the post you were responding to in order to wield this falsity. Dodging responsibility for your own actions is yet another of your common proclivities. |
