<<That may or may NOT be the case... obviously, unless you take externalities into account. Case in point, allowing free trade with no pollution tax to a company on the other side of the Rio Grande that is allowed to dump things our side can't dump.>>
Lowering my personal costs is good for me..full stomp and period. I have no control over your "case in Point" example.The environmentalist polititians can sanction out, fight out...the outcome.
<<It's good you are so frank... as the argument can then be evaluated by all. Unfortunately that is NOT usually the case, most holding those views are duplicitous liars, making it harder on all involve, especially the majority of people who would think your statement... well... insane or stupid, depending on weather they are feeling sorry for you or not. <NFG>..>>
Wow,.. you know!! most holding my "frank" views are ""duplicitous liars"" and the majority of people would think my statement insane or stupid, depending on weather they are feeling sorry for me or not. <NFG>..>>
Don't get omniscient Karnac, you are only one.<BFG>
<<Clearly... that is actually NOT that interesting... what is REALLY INTERESTING is that you won't see the likes of BRUMMAR and his ilk disagreeing with you... and your statement against all he PRETENDS to represent. Usually that type just wants another warm body (well, in your case that appears debatable -gg-) on their side.
Of course I would take that statement back if he were to prove me wrong, and NOT one of the duplicitous folks alluded to above, but that probably isn't likely. :)) >>
No need to rate what i say on your "interesting scale"..we don't matter much here on SI, nor does it matter much what Broomy or his ilk thinks.
|
