International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (25350)	11/11/1997 1:41:00 AM
From: HungryLion	Read Replies (3) of 35569

"Do you think BD would sit by and say nothing while IPM said they've got .80 opt, if BD was aware that they had nothing (and BD would certainly be aware of this by now)." How do know BD isn't saying anything? I'll bet if you checked the dumpster behind IPM's main office during the past six months you would have found a BD report <grin>. News flash Larry! BD has no obligation to you shareholders. They were under a 12 month contract when IPM said they have .80 opt so what do you expect them to do? Announce to the world "hey everybody IPM's a scam" or just let the contract expire and refuse to work with them again? BD is playing the role of the whoring consultant and is obligated to do whatever IPM tells them. What we need to do is flip flop the roles so that the verifier is the one dictating matters.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next