SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Archie R. Wortham who wrote (7025)9/11/1996 12:03:00 AM
From: Sturgeon   of 58324
 
Re: Matsushita deal.

The analogy that has been used to describe Iomega's business model is that of razors and blades. Sell the razors at a loss and make money off the blades. This business model is inevitable in industries where subsequent sales (disks) depend on the initial sale (drives). The same model exists in the video game industry because it operates on a software standard. Sega, Nintendo, and Sony all sell their machines at a loss and hope to make it up selling games.

What puzzles me about this deal is that Matsushita is making the drives not the disks. They are taking the part of the deal that makes little or no money. Obviously they don't intend to lose money so they will make sure they sell the drives at a good profit. How does this affect Iomega's ability to follow the razor/blades model? If Iomega sells drives at a loss (something competition may force them to do) what will Matsushita do?

It seems extremely unlikely that Matsushita is paying much to Iomega for the licensing agreement because of the limited profit potential in drives (as opposed to disks).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext