<Nope, in common usage by spokesmen for science, ID is routinely proclaimed to be creationism.>
1.) "spokesmen for science"- GEFAW!! Yea, the ones YOU follow! too funny.
2.) Better go change Wiki then:
<<However, the term is more commonly used to refer to religiously motivated rejection of certain biological processes, in particular much of evolution, as an explanation accounting for the history, diversity, and complexity of life on earth.[2]>>
Wrong again, but of course, it's besides the point. The point is you use ID's version of evolution to claim there is none... logically, as usual... the idiot moron.
DAK |
