<IOW as creationism.>
No, that's the WHOLE POINT... if it was CREATIONISM it would have been already decided. ID is widely seen as an end run around creationsim to effect the same result. Course you don't READ science, so you would't know... now you do.
Let's get back to the relevant part:
You're assertion at creationism = ID is telling however: combined with the fact that you DONT accept ID (a version of evolution with a creator involved) we can presume you ARE a CREATIONIST in the generally accepted use of the term in science:
""However, the term is more commonly used to refer to religiously motivated rejection of certain biological processes, in particular much of evolution, as an explanation accounting for the history, diversity, and complexity of life on earth""
en.wikipedia.org
And, as has been pointed out repeatedly... you continue to use support for evolution in an attempt to falsify it... REPEATEDLY. Making your state of mind subject to some form of cognitive problem, mental illness, or some other logical debilitation process.
DAK |
