Your plea makes sense. Your point about valid names also emphasizes the question, "If an individual will lie about his very own name what would he _not lie about?".
Unfortunately, based upon 'existing news data elements' about everything that can be said, analyzed, asked, and reported upon about IPMCF has already been done, ad nauseam. There is nothing left, but the 'wait' for some sort of 'shoe' to drop. What you are witnessing is a bunch of _very nervous emotional people reverting back to their lowest common denominator. On the S10 section of CIS's INVFORUM this data 'exhaustion' was recognized long ago, hence the lack of trafffic and _seemingly lack of interest in this subject over there.
However, we know that the interest _is there, all across the board(s). At this point 'waiting' is our best alternative. Those who wish to let off steam may - perhaps it is even theraputic, who knows? In the meantime . . .
The 'real news' will be initiated and quickly reflected in IPMCF's unfolding price/volume activity. At this point, that seems to be the only 'sensible thread' to be focusing upon. Hopefully, S.I. will resume its once interesting mixture when the 'tape' finally nods its head.
I applaude your plea. I am not optimistic about its future. Good luck, anyway.
Rod [Hollywood Beach, Ca.] |
