LOL, so you haven't been able to determine my position on ID so far?
----------------------------
<No one sees ID as "an end run around creationism". You don't understand what ANYONE thinks about the subject.>
LOTS of scientists think that... despite your silly claims, why don't you post some writing by scientists explaining that the creationism = ID?
Just read the wikipedia entry for intelligent design. The first two sentences will do.
-----------------------------
The IDEA that there is "design in nature" is nothing new
No, it goes back at least to the ancient Greek thinkers.
and you can hear the term used in virtually any biology class at any level.
If so, thats an act of "scientific heresy".
FUTHER, I have a sneaky suspicion that when SCIENCE (religionists wont, they haven't a clue) DOES begin to fill in the ideas of ID with real data and description... YOU WACKOS are gonna run like hell away from the God it describes! LOL
We can draw some inferences about God from the design of the universe and life. Namely that he very much wants life to exist, that human conceptions of time mean nothing to him, that he wants intelligent, introspective life to exist, though he values life other than man, as well. I think those things are good inferences from what we know. More is a matter of faith and experience. |
