The Residential Real Estate Crash Index Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (289308)	11/5/2010 10:53:08 AM
From: Les H	Read Replies (2) of 306849

You have no proof. You start out with assumptions that aren't factual and try to draw an conclusion from it. Try proving your premise before you move on to asking question based on those. Let me make it easy for you. Your statements: A1. WTC7 had its first 6 floors blown up BEFORE THE TOWERS FELL. A2. therefore, FALLEN TOWERS DIDN'T CAUSE IT." You can't assume statement A1 and then reach your conclusion based on it. For one, the statement isn't factual. The initial damage was caused by the fall of the second tower. There are witnesses and photos of the damage. B1. the damage done to WTC was asymmetrical, B2. the free fall was symmetrical. B3. why? and why free fall? free fall implies NOTHING IS THERE. Premise B1 is not factual. The initial damage occured on the sides of the building facing the collapsed towers. The subsequent damage spread throughout the building until it collapsed. Premise B2 is not proven and irrelevant to the case that a controlled demolition took place. I've seen demolitions where the collapse was symmetrical and others where they were not.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next