SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND)
ASND 200.34-0.9%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lerxst who wrote (22665)11/11/1997 2:07:00 PM
From: polarisnh   of 61433
 
Lerxst,

<OSPF is not a Cisco proprietary protocol. Also, OSPF is not necessarily a replacement for RIP/RIP2, but rather is a more powerful routing protocol that is more appropriate for large, enterpise networks with lots of intentional path redundancies. As I understand it, OSPF will reconverge far faster than will RIP when segment outages occur and uses less network bandwidth overall.>

I beg to differ with you that OSPF was not intended to a replacement for RIP. I did make a mistake for calling it a Cisco proprietary protocol. It was actually developed by the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) and is an open protocol.

I quote from the Cisco Internetworking Technologies Handbook, pg 634.

"Open Shortest Path First. Link-state, hierarchical IGP routing algorith proposed as a successor to RIP in the Internet community. OSPF features include least-cost routing, multipath routing, and load balancing. OSPF was derived from an early version of the IS-IS protocol."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext