SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (47119)11/12/2010 2:29:34 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Maybe they are toys or tricks. They are also polls. They are polls by common use, by multiple dictionary definitions, and even by the usage of most pollsters or polling experts (who call them "unscientific polls"). Words have meanings, if your try to be like Humpty Dumpty and have them mean whatever you choose them to mean, you harm your communication with the rest of the world.

Getting back to the original point, they may be unscientific as polls, but elections aren't worse at determining people's preferences than rigorous scientific polls; in this case the election showed more evidence of strong disapproval of Obama's policies, than the most similarly timed election showed disapproval of Reagan's policies.

Going even further back to the point you initially raised (about Obama's poll numbers looking similar to Reagan's), they have at times been very similar, and may be similar now, but shortly after this point in his presidency Reagan's numbers started to move solidly upwards. There isn't any good reason to think Obama's numbers will improve to the same extent, in fact they may not improve at all.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext