Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 39.51

-3.1%

Dec 11 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Merriwether who wrote (40031)	11/11/1997 6:00:00 PM
From: Fred Fahmy	Read Replies (3) of 186894

<I am an intel long but I am also a consumer. I am peeved by your silly, self serving statements. You would like consumers to buy new products from a company because the old products were defective?> I guess you're peeved because my comment went right over your head. It was said in jest, denoted by the <GGGG>. It was also meant to poke fun at anyone who would be ignorant enough to consider this an excuse to buy a new machine as some of the Intel bashers have suggested. Your Pinto analogy is really stupid. The chip is not "defective" if it is used as intented. I suppose you consider all PC's inherently "defective" since they can all be damanged by viruses. Amazing that the entire technology revolution has centered around the Pentium chip for the last several years without any problems from this bug isn't it? BTW, I hear that if you put sugar is someone's gas tank it can really do damange to the engine. I guess all cars are inherently defective <GGGG>. FF

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next