my evidence is the corrupt system.
my evidence is that palin is aligned with evil of BIG Capital - the rothschilds.
my evidence is that palin doesn't speak out against the EVILS debt based money, thereby supporting BIG Capital's Societal Asset Stripping Machine.
again, what you are calling evidence, is not evidence. just because rothschild supported her (if he did), doesn't mean she's a crook. and there are many people that aren't speaking out against debt based money. are they all crooks too? the system is corrupt so palin is a crook?? they'd laugh you out of court.
-------
my evidence is that palin attacks the constitution.
i posted a video of her doing that.
did you miss it?
i already answered that in my previous post to you. did you miss it?
--------
it is pretty apparent you've already been brow beaten so much by those who lie to you that you have already thrown in the towel.
no, what's apparent is that i don't automatically buy into unsubstantiated witch hunts.
----------
as long as obama loses, you are cool with the patriot act. you are cool with warrantless wiretapping. as loong a s republican is smiling back you while the looting goes on, you won't care.
this statement makes me want to call you a liar. i'll refrain from doing that, but please show me ANY post i've made showing that i'm 'cool' with warrant-less wiretapping. i know you can't because i've never been 'cool' with it. you disregard the fact that i've told you i don't give a crap about republicans or democrats. i'm for the most conservative, be they republican, democrat, independent or any other affiliation. and i have spoken out against the looting on other threads here on SI, not just this one. so everything you've said in the above statement is WRONG.
-------
it is precisely this approach that led me to say you've been manipulated by the media.
your approach makes me think that you don't think things out.
-------
i'd argue that it is obvious she sold out to BIG Capital... did she agree to allowing banksters to steal (crooks steal, gru) trillions from the american people to cover their (banskters) gambling losses?
yes, she supported tarp 1. she was intimidated by 'immunity' paulson's scare tactics that got it pushed through. she has since stated she regrets supporting it and didn't support any of the others. she doesn't understand economics. but then hardly any of the politicians do. but if she goes with the principles she says she believes in, then she doesn't need to understand economics, only adhere to her principles. nothing about this indicates she's a crook.
------
she runs interference for the crooks, acting as a gate keeper to keep the people from identifying her financial supporters as the rightful criminals - and that makes her a criminal.
this is a bunch of BS.
------
but you don't want to have a way to measure her success because you already know she'll allow the looting and continue attacking american civil liberties via the patriot act.
this one did it. you ARE a liar. |
